A public health initiative for pro-life Mike Pence to consider

A public health initiative for pro-life Mike Pence to consider


In Tuesday’s vice presidential debate between Tim Kaine and Mike Pence, both discussed how their Catholic faith influenced their personal opinion on abortion. During the debate, Democratic candidate Kaine asked Pence,

Why don’t you trust women to make this choice for themselves? We can encourage people to support life. Of course we can. But why don’t you trust women? Why doesn’t Donald Trump trust women to make this choice for themselves?

In the wake of these comments, some accused Kaine of “trying to have it both ways”- playing to a demographic of people who personally oppose abortion, while also attempting to garner votes from the pro-choice electorate.

However, we really can have it both ways by taking public health initiatives that simultaneously improve women’s reproductive health care while lowering the rates of teen pregnancy and abortion. It’s being proven in Colorado, as well as in the Carolinas.

Providing access to safe, long-term, reversible contraception has helped Colorado lower their teen birth and abortion rate faster than the lowering national average. The state has provided IUDs and implants to low-income women and teenage girls for free since 2007. About 1 in 15 of low-income women in Colorado use one of these forms of contraception because of the availability of the program. Both the IUD and the implant can be taken out if a woman decides that she is ready to have children, but are more than 99% effective at preventing unwanted pregnancies.

Using Colorado’s lowered rate of abortion and lowered rate of unplanned pregnancies, it stands to reason that a good way to prevent ‘unnecessary’ abortion is to aid women in gaining access to contraception. A private grant was needed to provide the types of contraception used in Colorado. Currently, Medicaid is encouraging providers to educate young women about the possibility of long-term, reversible contraception.

Unfortunately, Pence has proven himself as being against contraception in several forms. As a congressman in 2002, Pence gave an interview with Wolf Blitzer that indicated he was against condom usage because he believed they are not effective enough to prevent sexually transmitted diseases (a stance that fellow Congressman Schakowsky compared to disavowing flu shots because they are not always effective). As a congressman and as governor of Indiana, Pence made it his mission to end funding to Planned Parenthood (the clinic where many low-income women go for access to contraception) through Title IX. With Pence as our vice president, could we really see the public health and contraception initiatives enacted that would truly prevent abortion?

As Tim Kaine asked, do Mike Pence and Donald Trump trust women to make this choice for themselves?


2 thoughts on “A public health initiative for pro-life Mike Pence to consider

  1. Kaine’s stance on abortion really added a new depth to the Democratic ticket, perhaps one that wasn’t paraded as much as it should’ve been (or could’ve been in this particular election cycle). I don’t think the argument that he “tried to have it both ways” holds much water – it’s exactly what he believes, right? I think you and Kaine reframe the argument beautifully, and the Colorado example demonstrates how the real policy conversations could tackle the issue earlier and with less controversy. It’s too often forgotten that abortion is seldom ever a welcome course of action; if women had more options in all the realms of sexual health and disease prevention, we could come to realistic conclusions and solve real problems. But none of that can happen if Trump and Pence don’t believe women should have that agency. Their attitude is disturbing, but unfortunately not uncommon.


  2. Couldn’t agree more with this article, and with the hindsight 20/20 of the election I am equally scared for the national implementation of Pence’s policies (especially with him whispering into Trump’s ear). As a diehard liberal, it’s a strange thing to say, but after this election, I think this is the time to embrace states rights. Colorado, I believe, provides a great example for our nation to model after – that’s no going to happen – but with enough media attention and activism, state level changes can make a difference for our nation’s women. It’s about time that we don’t wait for policy to come from the Senate and House, and make it for ourselves on a smaller level.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s